The Institute · Governance

Institute Committees

Three independent bodies guide what we teach, what we publish, and how we conduct research. Together they form the governance architecture behind every Carrick Institute program.

  • Curriculum Development
  • Scientific Advisory
  • Institutional Review Board
Three Bodies · One Mission

Education that's accountable to the providers who trust us.

Carrick Institute exists to make integrative health education accessible, innovative, and clinically meaningful. Our committees hold us to that — challenging the curriculum, vetting the science, and protecting research participants.
Advisory Committee

Curriculum Development Committee

Reviews course content, learning outcomes, and program sequencing across all diplomate, fellowship, and certificate programs.
5 members
Advisory Committee

Scientific Advisory Committee

Independent scientific review of evidence, claims, and emerging research incorporated into Carrick Institute curriculum and publications.
5 members
Regulatory Authority

Institutional Review Board

Reviews and oversees research involving human participants in accordance with 45 CFR 46 and the ethical principles of the Belmont Report.
6 members
Advisory Committee

Curriculum Development Committee

A council of clinicians, educators, and program leads who help us pressure-test what we teach — so each program stays scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant, and worthy of the providers who trust us with their continuing education.
1

Annual curriculum review

Examine program scope, sequencing, and learning outcomes across diplomate, fellowship, and certificate programs.

2

Content recommendations

Flag legacy content for retirement and emerging clinical reasoning frameworks for inclusion.

3

Cross-discipline integration

Connect functional neurology, functional medicine, rehabilitation, and research science into a coherent body of knowledge.

4

Assessment design

Advise on competency frameworks, assessment instruments, and alignment with recognized certification bodies.

Members coming soon....
Advisory Committee

Scientific Advisory Committee

An independent scientific review body. Researchers, clinician-scientists, and methodologists who evaluate the evidence base behind what we teach and what we publish — and tell us when we've gotten it wrong.
1

Evidence assessment

Independent appraisal of the evidence cited in curriculum, white papers, and public-facing claims.

2

Emerging research

Surface peer-reviewed research that should inform — or challenge — current Carrick Institute teaching.

3

Publication review

Pre-publication scientific review of CI white papers, position statements, and research summaries.

1

Assessment design

Recommend areas where Carrick Institute should invest in original research, replication, or outcomes data.

Matthew AntonucciMatthew Antonucci

Matthew Antonucci

DC, DACNB, FACFN, FABCDD, FABVR, FABNN, FABBIR, FICC

Associate Professor of Functional Neurology

Paul BrewerPaul Brewer

Paul Brewer

OD

Assistant Professor of Neuro-Optometry

Robert CantuRobert Cantu

Robert Cantu

MA, MD, FACS, FACSM, FAANS, FICS

David ClarkDavid Clark

David Clark

DC, DACNB, FACFN, FABVR, FAAIM, FABBIR

Assistant Professor of Functional Neurology

Joseph ClarkJoseph Clark

Joseph Clark

PhD, ATC

Assistant Professor of Functional Neurology

Michael ComptonMichael Compton

Michael Compton

MSN, FNP-C, RNFA

Eric DinkinsEric Dinkins

Eric Dinkins

PT, MSPT, DPT, OCS, MCTA, Cert. MT, CDN

Presenter

Kenneth JayKenneth Jay

Kenneth Jay

MSc, PhD

Assistant Professor in Human Performance and Clinical Biomechanics

Julie KnollJulie Knoll

Julie Knoll

PT, NCS

John LeddyJohn Leddy

John Leddy

MD, FACSM, FACP, FAMSSM

Steven LopezSteven Lopez

Steven Lopez

MD

Mike NelsonMike Nelson

Mike Nelson

PhD, MSME, CSCS

Adjunct Assistant Professor of Research Science

Srinivas PrasadSrinivas Prasad

Srinivas Prasad

MD, FACC, FSCAI

Steven RoffersSteven Roffers

Steven Roffers

DC, DPT, PhD

Peter StaatsPeter Staats

Peter Staats

MD, MBA, FIPP, ABIPP

Regulatory Authority

Institutional Review Board

The Carrick Institute IRB reviews all research involving human participants conducted by, supported by, or affiliated with the institute. The board is constituted in accordance with U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations at 45 CFR 46.

This committee has decision-making authority.

Unlike the institute's advisory committees, the IRB has independent regulatory authority to approve, require modification of, or disapprove research involving human participants. Its decisions are binding within their scope and are not subject to override by Carrick Institute leadership.
1

Annual curriculum review

Examine program scope, sequencing, and learning outcomes across diplomate, fellowship, and certificate programs.

2

Content recommendations

Flag legacy content for retirement and emerging clinical reasoning frameworks for inclusion.

3

Cross-discipline integration

Connect functional neurology, functional medicine, rehabilitation, and research science into a coherent body of knowledge.

4

Assessment design

Advise on competency frameworks, assessment instruments, and alignment with recognized certification bodies.

Members coming soon....
Disclaimers & Liability Statement

Two committees advise. One has authority. All operate in service of the mission.

The Curriculum Development Committee, the Scientific Advisory Committee, and the Institutional Review Board are independent bodies established by Carrick Institute. The provisions below set out the legal posture of each, the limits of personal liability for committee members, and the boundaries of Carrick Institute's authority.
Part A · Advisory Committees

Curriculum Development & Scientific Advisory Committees

1

Advisory role only.

Members of the Curriculum Development Committee and the Scientific Advisory Committee provide recommendations, perspectives, and subject-matter input. They do not author, approve, deliver, accredit, or warrant any specific course, module, syllabus, instructional material, or published claim of Carrick Institute.

2

Carrick Institute retains full curricular and editorial authority.

All decisions regarding course content, structure, sequencing, faculty selection, accreditation pathways, learner outcomes, and published materials are made solely and finally by Carrick Institute. Committee input may be accepted, modified, or declined at the institute's sole discretion.

3

No endorsement implied.

A member's service on either advisory committee is not, and shall not be construed as, an endorsement by that member — or by their affiliated employers, universities, hospitals, professional societies, or other organizations — of any specific Carrick Institute course, product, service, marketing claim, or clinical outcome.

4

Listing of credentials and affiliations.

Member names, titles, credentials, and institutional affiliations are listed for biographical context only. Listing does not represent that a member's affiliated institution has reviewed, approved, or sponsored any Carrick Institute program.

5

No guarantee of clinical or educational outcomes.

Neither Carrick Institute nor any individual advisor guarantees any specific learner, clinical, professional, financial, or patient-care outcome arising from participation in Carrick Institute coursework or reliance on Carrick Institute publications.

6

Limitation of liability for advisors.

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, members of the Curriculum Development Committee and the Scientific Advisory Committee shall not be liable to learners, patients, or third parties for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special, or exemplary damages arising out of, or related to, Carrick Institute coursework, decisions, or actions taken in reliance on Carrick Institute materials.

7

Independence of the advisory role.

Advisory committee members are not compensated based on enrollment volumes, course revenue, or marketing performance. The advisory role is intended to support educational quality and scientific integrity, not commercial promotion.

Part B · Institutional Review Board

Authority, Independence & Member Protections

1

Regulatory authority and independence.

The Institutional Review Board is constituted, and operates, independently of Carrick Institute administration. The IRB has the authority to approve, require modification in, disapprove, suspend, or terminate research involving human participants in accordance with 45 CFR 46 and the institute's Federalwide Assurance.

2

No override.

IRB decisions made within its regulatory scope are not subject to override by Carrick Institute leadership, faculty, sponsors, or investigators. Carrick Institute may not approve research that the IRB has disapproved.

3

Good-faith service of IRB members.

IRB members serve in good faith to apply the regulations and the ethical principles of the Belmont Report. Carrick Institute indemnifies IRB members, to the fullest extent permitted by law, against personal liability arising from acts or omissions performed in good faith within the scope of their IRB duties.

4

No personal warranty of research outcomes.

IRB approval of a research protocol is not a warranty of the scientific validity, safety, or success of the research. IRB members shall not be personally liable to participants, investigators, or third parties for outcomes of approved research conducted in compliance with the protocol.

5

No guarantee of clinical or educational outcomes.

Neither Carrick Institute nor any individual advisor guarantees any specific learner, clinical, professional, financial, or patient-care outcome arising from participation in Carrick Institute coursework or reliance on Carrick Institute publications.

6

Reporting and recordkeeping.

The IRB maintains records as required by 45 CFR 46.115 and reports unanticipated problems, serious or continuing noncompliance, and suspensions or terminations of approval to appropriate institutional officials and federal agencies as required.

7

Scope of authority.

The IRB's regulatory authority is limited to the protection of human research participants. It does not extend to curriculum, editorial decisions, or non-research educational activities, which remain governed by Carrick Institute and its advisory committees as described in Part A.

Composition & rotation.

The IRB's regulatory authority is limited to the protection of human research participants. It does not extend to curriculum, editorial decisions, or non-research educational activities, which remain governed by Carrick Institute and its advisory committees as described in Part A.

Final authority over the curriculum.

Where recommendations from the Curriculum Development Committee or the Scientific Advisory Committee conflict with Carrick Institute's institutional mission, accreditation requirements, regulatory obligations, or the professional judgment of its faculty leadership, Carrick Institute's decisions prevail.
Continue Exploring

Built by clinicians. Reviewed by leaders. Taught for you.

Explore the disciplines, programs, and pathways our committees help us shape.